On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:17 PM, drago01 <drago01@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's still pending discussion, but there hasn't been much of that
>> following
>> the initial flurry.
>>
> I think that considering the blockers and the effort of pushing such update,
> and that the COPR works really well, we should probably not push it as a
> regular update.

No it does not work "really well" it lacks proper multilib support and
has to duplicate nay package that depends on anything it includes.
It is nice as a preview to get some feedback but it cannot replace a
regular update.

If you install both the i686 and the x86_64 like the COPR page says you should, it works well for multilib. I'm using it daily for my work laptop.


--
-Elad Alfassa.