On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:28:12PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:22:24PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > ISTM we have a few contenders that are not yet listed in the proposed
> > > changes[1] list:
> > > * Integrating distro upgrade
> > Sadly, I don't have anybody free to work on this in the short term. We
> > can probably pick this up in August, but by then it may be too late for
> > F23.
>
> It certainly would be nice for upgrades to be testable by the alpha
> release, mid August, but maybe that could be pushed back to a beta
> target? Seems kind of risky.
Given the Alpha freeze is end of July, that seems too late. I don't
like the idea of skirting deadlines to get something that's
historically touchy into a release at the last minute. I think what
Matthias is saying is F24 makes a better target here. That's fine;
I'm just looking to clarify.
> What's the fallback option here? Find someone to keep FedUp working for
> one more release?
Either that, or we have people resort only to something like
fedora-upgrade. Frankly, changing twice in the course of two releases
won't build user confidence, though. cc'ing wwoods to see what he
thinks.
Well we could turn fedup into a script that runs the new dnf plugin
under the hood to avoid that.