On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 06:28 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 08/21/2010 09:02 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Well, I believe Fedora should not do this by default. This just adds
>> > complexity, makes boot slower, and offers exactly zero advantages for
>> > laptop/desktop users. Also, sooner or later LVM will be obsoleted anyway
>> > by btrfs which integrates most of the LVM features into the fs
>> > itself. And in contrast to LVM the btrfs userspace is kinda nice.
>> >
> I've got no issues with not doing LVM by default here...
Is this then just a matter of go ahead and make the change?
JBG
Here is an older effort to do the same:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoDefaultLVM