On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:00:44 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
So the obvious question would be; Are we going to move toward
NetworkManager?
I agree that having multiple config stacks is bad, but the problem here
is choice (where did I hear that before?). As long as we're not forcing
the user / system admin to choose between s-c-n/NM, and/or service
network vs. NM, you'll have multiple config stacks. The problem may not
be solved by enabling upstream NM to take over s-c-n functionality and
stability and just force the use of NM over s-c-n, rather then just
letting (forcing) someone choose between the two configuration systems,
right?
I personally don't have an answer for this.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora