Matthias Clasen (mclasen(a)redhat.com) said:
> > 'DE core functionality' sounds vague. At this point
it might be more
> > honest to give up the term 'critical path' and just say that
everything
> > on the desktop live image is considered 'important'.
>
> This isn't a replacement for the 'critical path', that will still exist
> as a separate concept which is used for other purposes, and it has its
> own clear definition. This is a new definition of an 'important' package
> set, which will be used for this updates testing purpose.
Ah, ok. That makes more sense. But still, 'whats on the live cd' seems
like a reasonable approximation to repoclosure(core desktop + important
apps).
Perhaps. I was thinking that while we want to give some special attention
to things like the panel, gdm, control-center, etc. that we don't
necessarily need the same attention on cheese.
Bill