Hi,
IMHO I say that Firefox lately gets problems, and we have better
browsers in the repository already. We have Web, and pretty much
usable.
Zoltan
2016-01-07 14:29 GMT+01:00 Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar(a)gmail.com>:
ESR will only delay the problem.
Can the Fedora build add a secodary key to accept signed extensions?
AFAIK the long term plan is todeprecate the current method of extensions in
favour of a more browser agnostic approach.
On 7 January 2016 at 13:26, Jiri Eischmann <eischmann(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> there is currently a case against Firefox discussed in FESCo:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1518
>
> The problem in short: The last release of Firefox doesn't allow the
> user to install add-ons which are not signed by Mozilla by default, in
> the next version, you won't even be able to disable this behavior. This
> means that a couple of add-ons that are packaged by Fedora won't work.
>
> In my opinion, this problem has an impact on a relatively small number
> of users while suggested solutions will have an impact on majority of
> Workstation users. The author of the original ticket recommends Firefox
> is removed altogether if Mozilla doesn't change their plan, another
> suggestion is to switch to ESR which would mean that Fedora would have
> as conservative approach to Firefox updates as RHEL.
>
> Firefox is probably the most important desktop app in Fedora, so I
> wonder whether the Workstation working group should voice its opinion
> in this before any decision is made.
>
> Jiri
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
desktop mailing list
desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org