On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:38:44PM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
okay for FESCo? Of course, that would mean convincing all the
non-free
upstreams to add an extra file, as well as the traditional
semi-static-binary-plus-repo.rpm file.
Well, hopefully any work in that direction is not solely targeted at
making life better for proprietary vendors but also be useful to anyone
else trying to ship software for Fedora.
Which is the point we're at now. What FESCo has effectively said
is
"what we have now is fine", and we have a declining userbase that says
otherwise.
Do we have any data that shows that the declining number of users has
anything to do with less-then-perfect accessibility of proprietary
software?