On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Elad Alfassa <elad@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Non of the reasons you specified are good reasons to disable SELinux.
Critical bugs can happen in any software, if you fear them you should probably remove all software and go back to pen and paper...
Although pens can leak and make the page you was writing unreadable, so you should probably stop using pens too!

Do you see where I'm going with that?

Yes I do, and I have to add that an unreadable page, is what you said. Unreadable. Literally. None's reading it. 
 

Anyway, I think that even some of the people (I assume most of them don't) who work on the workstation want to disable SELinux,
I don't think the Base WG or FESCO would be happy with that. At all.

The SELinux UX can be improved, but it's not a reason to remove it completely.


I never said to remove it, you can add it optionally on Anaconda. Disk encryption is probably more important than SELinux,
but it is still an option.

Actually I never proposed anything here, I'm just pointing out something I think it might be a problem.
Since I learned how to use SELinux, I am okay with Fedora and it isn't even concerns me.  

- alex