On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 08:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:15 +0400, Alexey Torkhov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m wondering why was padding 10 added to default gnome-panel
> configuration? My panel at 1280x1024 with bunch of elements has now
> difficulties to fit them all. And at smaller resolutions, for example,
> at netbooks that wouldn’t be useful at all.
The padding was added because it makes things look less crammed
together. If it doesn't work for you,
gconftool-2 --type int --set /apps/panel/toplevels/top_panel/padding 0
gconftool-2 --type int --set /apps/panel/toplevels/bottom_panel/padding
0
Any chance instead of 10, maybe try using between 3-5 and see how that
works? It just seemed with 10, that the icons were a little *too* far
apart and took up a whole lot more room.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best lil town on Earth!"