On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 22:13 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> > I think apps should ship with both 64x64 and 128x128, and Software
> > should use the 64x64 ones still.
>
> From our draft HIG [1]: "It is essential your application has a
> 256x256px size. With the advent of high-DPI displays, a 512x512px
> variant is recommended." So it probably makes sense to require 256x256
> for applications installed by default. (The software center can be way
> more lenient.)
>
> [1]
https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/HIG/IconsAndArtwork
>
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
That's getting bigger and bigger as we speak!
I'm okay with requiring 128x128 for default applications, but 256x256 might
be asking too much...
I'm not sure what to do. I guess have 256x256 as MUST and 512x512 as SHOULD?
Do you have statistics on apps shipping 256x256 icons in Fedora right now?
How many are there? How many non-gnome apps do that?
That's overkill imo. The biggest icons we show in the UI are 96x96
(192x192 on hidpi) so 128x128 must with 256x256 as should is good
enough.