-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2014 01:18 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:33 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It might run afoul of the Firefox trademark thing. A rebranded
> "IceWeasle GNOME" loses all the brand recognition.
I know we are not allowed to apply unauthorized patches. I didn't
realize extensions might also be impermissible. If so, that would
be a strong argument against Firefox.
We should invoke the lawyers here, but I doubt that this would be
impermissible. I suspect that Firefox implicitly allows this simply by
offering a public extension interface and a freely-available mechanism
to apply them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOR+dkACgkQeiVVYja6o6MgywCfUEs4L4KMq6lfML657fSfOWRk
3WkAn2rVqkUFBXuWOLUwSdwk9DsIN3VR
=kFsT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----