On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Matthias Clasen<mclasen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Will Woods<wwoods(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 09:52 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Matthias Clasen<mclasen(a)redhat.com>
> >> > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 12:04 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, would it be possible to add a separate gconf key for it?
> >> >> I tested the "no icons mode" but well it looks like crap
if you are
> >> >> used to the "icon mode".
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Can you be more specific here ? What is 'it' ? And what looks
> >> > crap ? Are you talking about the panel menu or menus in general ?
> >> "It" = panel menu.
> > The panel menu is supposed to have icons in it, regardless of the state
> > of /desktop/gnome/interface/menus_have_icons.
> > So if you're not getting icons in your panel menu, it's because your
> > gnome-panel package is too old to know this. F11 won't behave properly
> > here. Ignore it, upgrade to Rawhide, or wait for F12.
> My comment was directed at "The one potentially confusing thing here
> is that the panel menu icons
> react to the settings at all (ie category icons come back if you turn
> menu icons on). Maybe we want to stop them from doing that."
> which means "make it always use no category icons"
Yes, this is what I was considering.
Yes and my suggestion was a separate key for this to make it less
confusing,but still preserve the option to have icons for those who