On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
Hi,
I will start with a TL;DR summary of my mail: we don't have to sandbox
our xdg-apps, like you say. But if we do, we should only allow running
sandboxed apps, even if it means we lose most of our apps. Otherwise,
the sandbox is pointless. It's a hard choice we'll need to make. Right
now, we're headed towards developing a useless sandbox, which is silly,
and it's time to apply the breaks and rethink that.
Sigh. We're going to simply disagree on this point. I cannot agree
with your black and white view on this. I understand your
argumentation, but I think it's overly drastic and defeatist.
josh