On 2/20/19 8:22 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This sort of statement pretty much invalidates any other statement
you might
make in this email. It's just beyond silly.
I see you have your typical, terse hat on today and no discussion will be fruitful.
This will be my last reply.
It's hard for end-users to know what to install, where to install
it from,
and how to get those GStreamer plugins installed.
This statement makes your statements about installing Flatpaks ironic.
The end-user interaction would be better by making them install from
Flathub,
rather than trying to figure out how to install codecs from a third-party
repository. I don't_think_ it's better, I know it to be better.
There's nothing positive I can say about this statement. Luckily Fedora allows the
many to do things the right way when others feel they know everything.
They don't work unless you install additional drivers which
aren't available
in Fedora.
I'm fully aware of this. My hands are involved in a few packages that use this
functionality.
> We also have RPMFusion stuff being suggested and installed today.
Why not
> extend
> that to the gstreamer1-libav/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly package(s)?
No we don't. RPMFusion is not linked from anywhere in the Fedora installations.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_Party_Software_Repositories