I'd rather it wasn't included at all, personally.
----- Original Message -----
> Hi folks! So an F24 beta blocker was proposed today:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330941
>
> because devassistant is not in F24 Workstation, and we have a criterion
> requiring that all 'core applications' listed at
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification#Core_A...
> must be present.
>
> Now you might note that devassistant isn't in that now, so what's the
> problem? It's not in it because I just took it out :)
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Workstation/Technical_Specifi...
>
> There was a meeting last year where its removal was agreed by the WG:
>
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2015-11-2...
>
> but no-one updated the tech spec. There is an outstanding question,
> however. It seemed from the meeting that people might want to keep
> including the CLI, but in fact, the main 'devassistant' metapackage was
> removed from comps:
>
>
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/commit/?id=3ba95e811800f0dd54...
>
> so no part of DA is in current Workstation composes. I don't know if
> you want to do anything about that. But I felt it was at least
> sufficiently clear that DA was no longer considered a 'core
> application' for Workstation and thus we don't need to block the Beta
> on it not being present.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>
http://www.happyassassin.net
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org