On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:07 -0500, xiphmont(a)xiph.org wrote:
On 2/27/07, David Zeuthen <davidz(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Rather, I should say the idea up for consideration is a thin
> > authenticator that is the only trusted connection mechanism for a
> > system pulse.
>
> Yea, that's sort of what I meant. The system-wide bit would just pass a
> fd over a socket to the per-session pulse.
Backwards.
How about posting a more detailed plan or replying to the one I posted
just before. And no manifestos in it this time either - we're not
terribly interested in why *you* think OSS is important to support since
it can be done by at least two mechanisms if you so desire. Thanks.
David