+1
This is simply defining the line in the sand with out-of-box installed
software, nothing more.
On 07/21/2016 11:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:34:24AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> I think that those advanced settings are better handled through optional
>> after-installation downloads, in much the same way that we don't ship
>> gnome-tweak-tool in the default installation (because if those settings
>> were required, we would really want them to be in the default settings UI).
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> I find this statement offensive to the intelligence of our users. It
> basically disrepects some users' preferences by saying they aren't
> "required" so it should be harder to set them.
No, it means that we don't show things that:
1) don't match use cases we're interested in
2) are work-arounds for particular use cases instead of properly designed fixes
3) are necessary for deployments, but not for individual users
If you think there are settings that are in gnome-tweak-tool should be available
in the main Settings panel, file a bug against gnome-control-center upstream,
and we'll consider it (if it hasn't already been).
We don't insult our users' intelligence, we just don't show settings that
only
benefit a very small minority of our users, especially when that very small minority
is part of the existing Fedora and GNOME users that already know about the
"TweakUI"
tools available.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org