On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA:
>
> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora KDE
> are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they will see
> as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE on top of it.
> I think this will be fine for some folks, but there'll be a
> significant constituency which just wants a KDE image.
>
> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can see
> both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the Workstation
> product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely legitimate and
> viable constituencies, which sort of means we've just created a
> bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure I see a clever
> magical solution to that, though. Engage brain cells...
>
I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE is
release-blocking *as an optional component atop the Workstation*.
Please explain this further. Having an optional component be release
blocking is making my head hurt.
josh