On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
"All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation
must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the
policy.)
That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we *do*
comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw it
in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :)
We used to have polish criteria for the desktop, and then we'd
inevitably find issues late in Final testing and no-one would want to
block release for them, it got to be a bit absurd, which is why we
dropped those criteria a couple of releases back. I'm fine with having
them, but it needs a concerted effort to actually live up to them, and
to really consider them to block the release.
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 17:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We don't really have criteria relating to a11y or complex input methods;
> this isn't Workstation-y in particular, but something that might be
> interesting?
a11y is a good target not just for release criteria, because it is
absolutely essential for a few users, but also for a test plan, since an
a11y regression is quite likely to be missed by developers.
> Appearance is something we'd want to enforce if it were actually done,
> but I get the impression the Qt variant of Adwaita isn't actually
> written yet.
This may be too subjective for a release criterion. How would we phrase
it? "Qt apps must not look terrible" doesn't seem quite right....
The Tech Spec I was reading as I wrote my mail (sorry if I didn't make
that clear) states that GNOME and KDE must use a unified appearance.
That's what I was referring to.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net