On Wed, 13.04.16 08:44, Bastien Nocera (bnocera(a)redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
> > Second, my understanding is
> > that the ABRT developers prefer to improve abrt-cli and tell people to
> > use that rather than coredumpctl.
>
> Any particular reason for that preference? As coredumpctl gets more
> and more widespread, having the same tool as other distros should make
> Fedora more approachable which I think is a good thing?
The upstream systemd developers I talked to weren't interested in adapting
coredumpctl to be usable for use cases other than for developers.
What precisely do you need?
It doesn't claim to be usable for end-users reporting bugs, and
the original
developers have no interest in making changes that would allow that.
I indeed think coredumpctl should probably be something for more
professional users. But I'd be curious what you are missing in
coredumpctl.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat