On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:15 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:13:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> +# repoquery --whatrequires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-python2-applet
> +# as of Fedora 15 20110428
> +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet
> +Obsoletes: file-browser-applet
> +Obsoletes: glunarclock
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-bubblemon
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-cpufire
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-globalmenu
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-grandr
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-sensors
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-window-picker
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applets
> +Obsoletes: gnome-netstatus
> +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet
> +Obsoletes: gnubiff
> +Obsoletes: lock-keys-applet
> +Obsoletes: uim-gnome
> +Obsoletes: deskbar-applet
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-jalali-calendar
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-timer
> +Obsoletes: gnome-applets
> +Obsoletes: gnome-schedule
> +Obsoletes: hamster-applet
> +Obsoletes: x-tile
Shouldn't these Obsoletes: be versioned just in case someone wants to
introduce a newer version of a package with the same name later?
+1, obsoletes should *always* be versioned.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net