----- Original Message -----
> Here's the second draft of the charter.
Thanks, Josh! Overall it looks pretty good to me -
I have put some comments below.
> Members of the Work Group are chosen by the Work Group as seats become
> available. In the event that a current member relinquishes their
> seat, the Work Group will fill the seat by selecting a candidate and
> approving by majority consensus. Eligible candidates must be in the
> FPCA+1 group. The Work Group is highly encouraged to seek out
> candidates that have been showing persistent and high quality
> contribution to the Workstation product.
Basically looks okay to me.
What does the "+1" mean here though? Is "FPCA Group" sufficient?
However some Red Hatters are in the Red Hat Employee CLA group instead.
I'd say it means "Any non-CLA Group" as for FESCo elections. So you
have to sign agreement and be at least in one other group. If it's true,
I'd probably use the same wording (even CLA should be probably fixed in