-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/22/2014 04:54 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
Hi all. As you may know, we need to create a comps group for Fedora
Workstation.
The comps file already has a comps group named
"developer-workstation-environment", but it contains things that
we might not want to put in the default Workstation environment.
So, should we "take over" that group and change it to fit our
needs, or create a new group? if we create a new group, what should
we call it? should the comps group be named fedora-workstation,
workstation, or something completely different?
All I need is your input regarding naming here, I'll do all the
boring part (adding it to comps and making sure we don't add any
packages in the kickstart file).
We should probably arrange it so that both the Workstation and Server
products follow the same approach for dealing with comps. In my ideal
world, it would be possible during a net install for us to have a
single high-level package selection in Anaconda that was:
* Fedora Workstation
* Fedora Server
* Fedora Custom (Leading to the traditional dialogs).
Thoughts?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlN95NYACgkQeiVVYja6o6M9vACfVRWjY+zBZpinp0SA2bhGUQuK
ftYAoIX8LsPoODV0cZGjhIv9vLbunYYt
=MoSr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----