On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 02:46:22PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> 3) The netinst image should not look like an equal alternative to the
> "live" image (which I think is a misnomer) in the web presentation.
This is a good time to fix misnomers -- what would you rather say?
The question of where and how to present came up in the Release
Readiness meeting today, so this needs an answer. robyduck in the
websites group stands ready to assist, but the current state is here
for review/changes:
http://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease#workstation
> I don't have strong opinions about whether we make the
netinst image
> available at all. My vague feeling is that yes, it should be available,
> because it's more similar to a kickstarted installation of the
> workstation, which is probably useful have working and tested to give
> identical results to the live image installation.
And presumably it would be the preferred starting point for workstation
kickstart installs.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com