Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 12:24, Mariano Draghi wrote:
>I believe it has to do with the fact that the "official" or
"standard"
>MIME/type for the RPM extension is "Real Media" something.
>So at some point it was decided to leave the .rpm files without
>asociation (an asociation with "Install Packages" would be non-standard,
>and an asociation with Real Media Player would be a mistake in a
>rpm-based distribution as FC2)
That can't be right - we should be able to use sniffing anyhow, or at
least associate the ".arch.rpm" extension if not plain ".rpm"
Should I file a bug on this?
Steven Garrity