On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 12:00 +0000, desktop-request@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Right. I could have worded my post more clearly, I suppose, but it was
intended for the audience that was reading at the time, and there's an
implicit assumption behind it: this is really not a Fedora-level issue,
it's an upstream ecosystem one. Both the choices Fedora had were bad
ones: stick with a rapidly decaying and ancient Bluetooth stack, or
update it and lose some useful features. Those were literally Fedora's
only choices. Either would have made someone unhappy.

I'm hopeful we can get the necessary buy-in from various folks to have
slightly higher basic functionality requirements for Fedora Workstation
than we did for the desktop under the ancien regime, but "working high
bitrate Bluetooth audio" is probably beyond the level of 'things we're
likely to block the release on' still. I recognize that it's somewhat
annoying if you've just bet the farm on it, but we have practical
considerations to bear in mind too - we don't have infinite development
resources we can throw around to fix upstream problems.

As I said, I'm not really here to bash anyone and I understand your position.  We do appreciate all the work people put into Fedora.

But I really want to help fix things, is there anything except writing code I can do to help fix things? (writing code is sadly not one of my talents :-) We're willing to put some decent testing time and QA into it.

Is there already upstream code in Rawhide?

Jorick Astrego
Netbulae B.V.