On Mar 7, 2013 12:16 AM, "Tom Callaway" <tcallawa@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2013 05:06 PM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
>
> > I think the license problem is gone if you make the icon db part of the
> > repo metadata, because you don't have License tags for it, right?
>
> Just because the metadata doesn't have a license tag doesn't mean we're
> magically cleared of the need to comply with all of the licenses of all
> of those icons.
>
> ~tom
>
> ==
> Fedora Project
So what is the difference, legally speaking, between packing all icons in an xz archive and having icons inside packages on the iso? In both cases we distribute them all together. Do any of the licences actually says that the ISO scenario is okay but the xz archive one isn't?