On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:43 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:32:54 -0500,
Charles Kerr <charles(a)transmissionbt.com> wrote:
> I don't have much experience with pngout, but it claims to be able to
> shave an extra 14% off these images' sizes. I tried it out on the
> four images in standard/ and got this result:
While better lossless compression would be a good thing to be doing for
all of the artwork, I don't think that is going to help enough here.
Given the short amount of time, I don't think this approach (assuming it
was expanded to include a larger set of artwork) is going to be practical
as an immediate solution.
Once, we used optipng for that, but the savings really
aren't that much
(depending on picture, about 10%) plus they're time-intensive.
Martin