Isn’t this a bit ot? This is the design team, which is meant for design of Fedora (not the OS itself, but the theme, artwork, etc). I’m not over the team, or a mod, but I think this is ot, and is kind of strange seeing this in a design team... Thanks!
 
 
From: Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 4:52:46 PM
To: design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [Design-team] Fedora GRUB2 boot menu, from design perspective
 
Hi Elad,

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:07:59 +0300
Elad Alfassa wrote:

> refer to this thread in -devel:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168712.html
>
> As I understand, by design, we wanted the older kernels to appear in
> the "Advanced options" menu, but right now, it breaks every time you
> run a kernel update.
> Also, the string Fedora Linux is kinda wrong, cause the OS is called
> Fedora.
> It should be something like Fedora (with Linux *kernel version here*).
>
> What is the stand of the design team on this?
>

first of all, I do *not* speak for the design team, just stating my
opinion.

The intended design is probably best what we can have but,
 * Given the fedora target audience, it's not uncommon to have multiple
  fedoras installed, so it would be good if the items looked like
  Fedora $REL_VER$ $REL_NAME$ (or without the release name).
 * All kernels should be in subdirectory. That the current kernel
  updates break the intended setup (as set-up in /etc) is obviously
  incorrect and should be fixed. Both ways (submenus or direct menu)
  are better than current state of things.
 * I do not seem to see any theme, even though there's obviously the
  beefy-miracle one installed. It's probably missing in configs
  (/etc/grub.d/) though -- my issue, or a general one?

Cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team