[Bug 1006104] Review Request: gqrx - Software defined radio receiver powered by GNU Radio and Qt
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
Eric Christensen <sparks(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sparks(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Eric Christensen <sparks(a)redhat.com> ---
SPEC says license is GPLv3+ but I also found some BSD-licensed pieces:
/dsp/agc_impl.cpp
/qtgui/freqctrl.cpp
/qtgui/meter.cpp
/qtgui/meter.h
/qtgui/plotter.cpp
as well as some unlicensed pieces:
/dsp/afsk1200/costabf.c
/dsp/agc_impl.h
/input/fcdctl/hid-libusb.c
/input/fcdctl/hidapi.h
/input/fcdctl/hidmac.c
/input/fcdctl/hidraw.c
/input/fcdctl/hidwin.c
/qtgui/freqctrl.h
/qtgui/plotter.h
/qtgui/qtcolorpicker.cpp
/qtgui/qtcolorpicker.h
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
10 years, 8 months
[Bug 557760] Merge Review: sabayon
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557760
Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Last Closed| |2013-09-10 08:25:00
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
- rpmlint checks return:
sabayon.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Wed Sep 20
2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 2.20.1-1
This error occurred when rpmlint used rpm to query the specfile. The error is
output by rpm and the message should contain more information.
I've fixed this.
private-shared-object-provides, incorrect-fsf-address,
executable-marked-as-config-file, script-without-shebang,
no-manual-page-for-binary from above.
I'm not going to hold this up on those, though you should look into the
private-shard-object-provides if you get a chance.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( GPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
Fixes applied, APPROVED, closing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
10 years, 8 months