On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
At the Fedora Project Board call today, one thing we talked about is
the
desire for a slightly more active CWG. Right now, it appears that the board
is the first level of escalation, and we hope that could be the last
resort.
That's fine, if that's what you want. When it was originally created, the
CWG was meant to be reactive -- we traditionally haven't gotten involved in
a situation (as a group) until we've been specifically asked to. I'm happy
to jump in a be more proactive when mailing list discussions get out of
hand -- I just don't want to overstep our charter.
It probably wouldn't hurt to have the Board let us know exactly what and
how they'd like us to work, and go back through and see who is still
willing/able to help out in the CWG. In the meantime, I'll be more
vigilant in the mailing lists about trying to help people "be excellent".
--
Jared Smith