On Sun, 31 May 2015 18:14:38 +0100
Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 18:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Seems my impression is correct and it has become a personal issue:
(did you send this to Michael too?)
I've just gone through the links that you've posted and agree
raveit65 could be more "excellent to each other" here.
If the other CWG members agree, I would like to invite both parties to
the CWG private mailing list to help diffuse the situation?
(We haven't a proper system in place and I think this will be a good
way of doing it going forward - we invite the concerned parties to the
private ML to diffuse the situation and then they can be un-subscribed
after - that way the private ML becomes a nice communication channel
for the parties and the CWG will be aware and can help out nicely too
- better than one of us privately mailing then parties like we've
done in the past?)
The problem with that is that when you subscribe someone they have full
access to the archives, so they can look back at any other stuff from
the past. :(
So, I don't think thats too great an idea...