On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:22 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
That's fine, if that's what you want. When it was originally
created,
the CWG was meant to be reactive -- we traditionally haven't gotten
involved in a situation (as a group) until we've been specifically
asked to. I'm happy to jump in a be more proactive when mailing list
discussions get out of hand -- I just don't want to overstep our
charter.
It probably wouldn't hurt to have the Board let us know exactly what
and how they'd like us to work, and go back through and see who is
still willing/able to help out in the CWG. In the meantime, I'll be
more vigilant in the mailing lists about trying to help people "be
excellent".
+1
I do keep an eye on the mailing lists, but more often than not issues
are settled by the list moderators - or in specific cases, things are
escalated directly to the board.
We're still the initial members the board had chosen. I think we were
supposed to set up methods for the "reformulation" but we haven't gotten
down to it yet - probably because we haven't had to be too active on
this front.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG