On Mar 19, 2015 6:04 PM, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:37:12AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:49:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >> > To be honest, I would delete it entirely.
> >> As one of that page's original authors, I agree. The WGs and other
> >> events have overtaken this page.
> > I don't have a problem with that, but note that it is linked to by
> > about 80 other pages on the wiki. I'm about half serious about
> > suggesting that we should start anew with a clean slate. (More
> > precisely, a new wiki for documnetation only, with clear separation
> > between user documentation and internal-facing documentation, and
> > between drafts and final documents. Leave the existing wiki as an
> > anything-goes workspace.)
> The solution to stale wikis is not to create more wikis...
It's also not to use a wiki to set the future direction for
Is this a problem for docs (or a collaboration between docs and marketing)?
Why does the council have anything to do with the IA of fedora's
communication for documentation , org, getting started, etc? I could see
"approval" or "objective identification" but not "solution".
I would posit
that the people in those groups are way more competent in the subject than
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
- - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
council-discuss mailing list