#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy
-------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: workstation |
-------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by aday):
Replying to [comment:30 jwboyer]:
> "However, the availability of non-free software options can
be
advertised prior to its enablement, provided that specific details about
that software are not displayed."
I actually think that additional clause is counter to what Matt is
aiming for. Or
perhaps I'm misunderstanding. Why would we advertise e.g.
Chrome as available but having no details without the user explicitly
opting in to non-free software?
That suggestion was my attempt to rephrase Matt's original proposal, so
maybe there was a misunderstanding along the way (or maybe I'm just not
communicating well). The idea, I thought, was to indicate that non-free
software is available in a generic way, without giving details about the
individual non--free apps (imagine something like "enable non-free
software to see more").
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:32>
council <
https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets