On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Gabriele Trombini <g.trombini(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I'm really confused,
Me too!
here [1] FOSCo was underway but till today I never heard anything
about their instances [2] since it's stuck (on March?).
In this page [3] wiki explain what FOSCo is and FAmSCo approved the
setting up.
I think that's correct.
In the last months FAmSCo would have been terminated, but nothing
happened (as far as I know), so it went ahead doing basic things
just like being the Ambassadors point of reference (and even just this
justifies its existence).
Which is great. I'm glad the work was continued.
Now Council takes care of budgeting (and that's ok), but what
about
Ambassadors coordination? We know ambassadors are our front men and
leaving them going forward without a committee that is able to get in
touch with all the parts of the Project is harmful. There are dozens of
ambassadors around the world and we can't allow them to go without a
coordination.
I agree.
Yes there's the ambassadors meetings but they are separated for
each
region and I don't like they would not communicate anymore. Don't think
Council is able to do this as well.
Finally, I can't believe that leaving every part of the Project (except
FESCo things) in the Council's hands would be useful and faster.
Definitely not. The Council doesn't _want_ to handle this either. It
actively wants FOSCo (or whatever) to exist as soon as possible.
So FAmSCo or FOSCo, but one of them must happen.
Yes, absolutely.
josh