You're creating a behavior problem with your operator teams with this without some slack for the users.

I myself actually walked in one day to a multichannel ban from a fedora operator recently and was refused an explanation  without any event having occurred within at least a year.

No discussion.  I think they had done a retroactive from a year prior as an excuse but I didn't have details.

Your users need protected from your operators' judgement too to prevent a hostile environment.

-C

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 5:48 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:23 PM Langdon White <langdon@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> my comment here is just that the multi-channel ban sounds like a "bundle" and I think we want two separate bans, one in "community 1" and one in "community 2" with separate tickets and reasoning.
>
I didn't intend to create a bundle, so this is good feedback. I've
made it more clear in a new edit:
https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/c/81b2220a2d502ef666c9ed5bca98421b34decfe2?branch=channel_bans

> otherwise, I'm good (aside from "fora", seriously, did you have to look that up??!! ;) )
>
This has been a pet peeve of mine for many years. We all have our hangups. :-D

--
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org