Did we ever get a more authoritative answer on this thread to
what the incubator is meant to incubate? I don't think Matthew
ever directly responded to that. Seems people assume its
either for incubating Fedora related technologies, so for instance
the Fedora Media Writer could have been incubated there.
Or is is meant as a place to incubate future Fedora editions?
I am having trouble inputting on the naming without understanding
where the idea is coming from and what problem it will solve
that we currently have.
Christian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb(a)redhat.com>
> To: council-discuss(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 2:37:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Creating a "Fedora Incubator" brand
>
> On 04/29/2016 12:56 PM, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> >
> > Personally, of the three, I think "Forge" sounds the best and
it's
> > already a commonly used term for the place where software development
> > happens. Plus, I can easily see a pretty strong logo idea / general
> > theme for something like this. Just my 2ยข!
>
> There's an openSUSE Factory IIRC so .. probably not. And "Forge" has
> some connotations probably best avoided. It was all the rage to call
> things a this or that forge years ago, and I think SourceForge sort of
> soured the term.
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
> jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council-discuss mailing list
> council-discuss(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@lists.fedorapr...
>
> The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
> open source software and content as a collaborative community.