On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Richard Fontana
As an aside, I wonder if the GPL family tradition of numbering
provisions from 0 is something the world has grown tired of. It
strikes me as being a flawed attempt at a joke that may have been more
sociologically relevant at the time when the early versions of the GPL
were being drafted. Just throwing that out there; at the moment
copyleft-next still follows GPL practice of numbering sections from 0.
Especially since used for the definitions, I don't think it matters
all that much.
I would urge more consistency in numbering generally, though. e.g.,
Sec. 10's sub-sections are numbered; Sec. 7's are not. Sec. 8's
requirements are lettered; Sec. 4's are not. (Those are all the issues
I see in a quick run through; the aggressive editing of every other
section in the document is really quite impressive.)