On 06/27/2016 03:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
OK I'll refer to it this way, using
http://copyleft-next.org/
Anything else? Since >= is an explicit part of the license how about the
simpler version:
* Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof(a)kernel.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the latest copyleft-next license as published
* online and available at the following URL:
*
*
http://copyleft-next.org/
I think that's okay. I'm still thinking about an 'official' recommended
license notice. My inclination is to say that it's better to give a
license version number (despite the built-in license upgradeability),
but I'm kind of undecided.
Richard