On Feb 22, 2013 1:50 AM, "Richard Fontana" <fontana(a)sharpeleven.org>
wrote:
[...] I'll explain what this section is intended to
do (in the 0.2.0 version):
* If I (copyright holder) offer My Work (the work I inject with my
copyright interest) under copyleft-next, and later (after a 1-year
grace period has elapsed) offer the same work or [approximately] a
derivative work under a *proprietary* license (defined negatively as
something that doesn't meet the OSI OSD), then I additionally
license my copyright in My Work under the Apache License 2.0 (thus
giving everyone in the world an equal right to make proprietary
derived works).
It would make sense to have the sunset license and the poison pill license
be the same.
Btw, is "permissive-next" Apache License 2.0 compatible, explicitly or
implicitly