Richard Fontana wrote on 7 November:
That being so, it stands to reason that the anti-lockdown supplement
should also stay deleted,
I was convinced by Mike Linksvayer's message that the supplement
structure is confusing and needs reworking. I'm ok with all supplements
staying out, provided we get the policy issues sorted out in the main
text of the license for both issues: network services and lock-down.
Sadly, things haven't gone in a good direction on that regard, as I've
mentioned in other threads.