On 01/15/2013 02:19 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
As for FSF, that is another matter. Unlike the OSI, the FSF does not
(AFAIK, Josh Gay or [when he reads this in five months] Bradley can
correct me if I'm wrong) have any sort of known *formal* approval
process, and I do not know whether the FSF would be inclined to give
an opinion on a license not yet in use for actual software of some
non-marginal nature, although I believe there is past precedent at
least with respect to essays analyzing new licenses by RMS.
On 06/15/2013 02:28 PM, Josh Gay will write:
It is unlikely we would add it to our list of various licenses and
comments about them page until either it has started to have widespread
adoption or a lot of people began asking us for our opinion. But, there
are other reasons we might consider adding it. For instance, if it turns
out be so good we would recommend it over our existing licenses, then we
would probably write extensively about it. Or, if it is so bad we
wouldn't want anybody to use it, we might add it to the list to
discourage people from using it.