On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:31:00PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
This is a strange idea, but it is a kind of stronger copyleft than
exists under MPL-like licenses.
I'm not sure I understand why you consider it "stronger". The main
difference as I understand it from your description is that unlike in
the MPL, where the copylefted files and non-copylefted files can be
distributed in the same tarball, in your proposal, this is prohibited,
and the files have to be distributed in two separate tarballs. Is
that a correct rendering of your idea?
If so, what's the benefit you see flowing by requiring the files to be
distributed separately?
Thanks,
- Ted