On St 23. červenec 2014, 13:33:06 CEST, Richard Marko wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 01:42 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
>> What do you think? Do you think this makes sense for copr?
> If we could use COPR to make Beaker packages for Fedora and EPEL *and*
> upload Dockerfiles to generate Docker images for the various components,
> that would be seriously cool. On the other hand, it might make more
> sense as a separate service that reacts to fedmsg events indicating new
> COPR builds are available.
+1 for separate service.
I am not against separate service. The separate service would probably
simply mean running Docker in some cloud instance and call it's API
through docker-python bindings and then collect the results.
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Brno, Czech Republic