On 07/23/2014 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 07/23/2014 01:42 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> What do you think? Do you think this makes sense for copr?
If we could use COPR to make Beaker packages for Fedora and EPEL *and*
upload Dockerfiles to generate Docker images for the various components,
that would be seriously cool. On the other hand, it might make more
sense as a separate service that reacts to fedmsg events indicating new
COPR builds are available.
+1 for separate service.