-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/06/2014 07:57 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 06.05.2014 13:56, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue 06 May 2014 07:50:46 AM EDT, Stef Walter wrote:
>> On 06.05.2014 13:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2014 07:19 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>>> On 05/06/2014 11:29 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>>>>> we just changed the port that Cockpit listens on by
>>>>> default. It's just nicer.
>>>> Very much indeed! This will make it a lot easier to
>>>> remember what to dial in to.
>>> Looks like 1001 is not registered to any known service.
>>> Probably would be a good idea to contact IANA and get this
>>> made official.
>> Would that work? Or would we just be treated as a website, and
>> told to go port 80?
> No, I think it makes perfect sense to have a separate address
> for a management service. We don't necessarily have to reserve it
> for Cockpit alone, but perhaps requisition it for "HTTP-based
> system management consoles".
> Multiplexing port 80 is a hack of the worst kind and I think we
> can make that argument.
Sounds good. Are you interested in writing the IANA?
Sure, I'll write something up later today.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----