On 05/06/2014 08:24 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 05/06/2014 07:57 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
> On 06.05.2014 13:56, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Tue 06 May 2014 07:50:46 AM EDT, Stef Walter wrote:
>>> On 06.05.2014 13:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>> On 05/06/2014 07:19 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>>>> On 05/06/2014 11:29 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we just changed the port that Cockpit listens on by
>>>>>> default. It's just nicer.
>>>>
>>>>> Very much indeed! This will make it a lot easier to
>>>>> remember what to dial in to.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like 1001 is not registered to any known service[1].
>>>> Probably would be a good idea to contact IANA and get this
>>>> made official.
>>
>>> Would that work? Or would we just be treated as a website, and
>>> told to go port 80?
>>
>>
>> No, I think it makes perfect sense to have a separate address
>> for a management service. We don't necessarily have to reserve it
>> for Cockpit alone, but perhaps requisition it for "HTTP-based
>> system management consoles".
>>
>> Multiplexing port 80 is a hack of the worst kind and I think we
>> can make that argument.

> Sounds good. Are you interested in writing the IANA?


Sure, I'll write something up later today.

> _______________________________________________
> cockpit-devel mailing list
> cockpit-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cockpit-devel


Anyone running this on Rawhide, getting any AVC messages, nothing in the cockpit policy to allow it to listen on any ports.