It doesn't make much sense to me, because upstream apps aren't supposed to know about the package manager that installed them.

i.e. Apache doesn't complain about RPM new files, and I can't think of any other app that does.

On Friday, January 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mann, Owen wrote:

What does the list think of this RFE?

- make `cobbler check` complain about .rpmnew files

 

 

From: cobbler-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:cobbler-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Michael DeHaan
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:29 AM
To: cobbler mailing list
Subject: Re: cobbler xmlrpc subnet/netmask issue

 

That's all templated out, check /etc/cobbler and you should find a template that references the old value, and probably a ".rpmnew" version that does not, that needed to replace the old one.

 

Make sure you preserve any edits you might have made to the original template.

 



*******************************************************
This message (including any files transmitted with it) may contain confidential and/or proprietary information, is the property of Interactive Data Corporation and/or its subsidiaries, and is directed only to the addressee(s). If you are not the designated recipient or have reason to believe you received this message in error, please delete this message from your system and notify the sender immediately. An unintended recipient's disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message or any attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful.
*******************************************************
_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
cobbler@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler