Thinking about this in terms of what is 'really' there...

The power control interface is just an entry of what address to connect to for controlling the power for a system so it should not be in there and I don't think we should be taking DHCP information from there, this seems 'unclean'.

However the DRAC and iLO cards are network interfaces on the systems from a hardware point of view so either these should be treated as systems them selfs or as network interfaces of the parent system.  Now this is what I am doing at the moment because I figured in the future cobbler could host 'images' for upgrading devices like these, switches or routers lets say.  This makes a lot of sense to me and fits in the current model, what do other people think?

Take care.

On 17 Mar 2009, 9:44 PM, "Michael DeHaan" <mdehaan@redhat.com> wrote:

James Cammarata wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:16:00 +0000, Robert Lazzurs <rob@lazzurs.net> wrote:...

Let's perhaps think about the CLI for --ksmeta instead.  Should
--in-place just be the default or do we need something different?

This may solve it without architectural or migrational problems.

--Michael

_______________________________________________ cobbler-devel mailing list cobbler-devel@lists.fed...